PsyberSpace: Understand Your World

Understanding Psychological Reactions to High-Profile Violence

In this episode of PsyberSpace, host Leslie Poston explores the complex psychological reactions to high-profile acts of violence, using a recent incident involving the death of a healthcare CEO as a case study. The discussion delves into the psychological phenomena of priming, scapegoating, and how media framing affects public sentiment. The episode also examines the collective responses to systemic healthcare failures and the role of digital communication in amplifying emotional reactions. Leslie highlights the importance of understanding these psychological currents to foster a more empathetic and proactive society.

00:00 Introduction to PsyberSpace
00:24 Exploring Psychological Reactions to Violence
01:08 Priming and Initial Reactions
03:36 Scapegoating and Blame
10:21 The Role of Media in Shaping Perceptions
13:38 Systemic Healthcare Failures and Psychological Impact
16:26 Leadership and Crisis Response
19:05 Collective Identity and Solidarity
22:03 Systemic Review and Institutional Change
24:36 Pathways to Meaningful Change
26:18 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Research:

Aquino, K., et al. (2021). Vigilantism, Violence, and the Defense of Social Order. Academy of Management Proceedings.

Asif, M. (2022). Police legitimacy and approval of vigilante violence: The significance of anger. Theoretical Criminology.

Asif, M., & Weenink, D. (2019). Vigilante rituals theory: A cultural explanation of vigilante violence. European Journal of Criminology.

Bandura, A. (2002). Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Moral Education.

Bandura, A., et al. (1996). Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Bateson, R. (2020). The Politics of Vigilantism. Comparative Politics.

Bruinsma, G., et al. (2003). Public support for Vigilantism.

Chen, F. X., et al. (2022). The vigilante identity and organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Chen, F. X., et al. (2022). Suffering saviors: Relationships between perceptions of interpersonal victimhood, the vigilante identity, and the monitoring and punishment of norm violators. Personality and Individual Differences.

Cikara, M. (2015). Intergroup Schadenfreude: motivating participation in collective violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

Cohen, D., et al. (2022). Collective Vigilantism in Global Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics.

Collins, R. (2009). Micro and Macro Causes of Violence. International Journal of Conflict and Violence

Eidelson, R. J., & Eidelson, J. I. (2003). Dangerous ideas. Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist.

Eisenberg, N., et al. (2010). Empathy-related Responding: Associations with Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Intergroup Relations. Social Issues and Policy Review.

Goldstein, D. (2003). "In our own hands": Lynching, justice, and the law in Bolivia.

Haas, N. E., et al. (2014). Public support for vigilantism, confidence in police and police responsiveness.

Kasra, M. (2017). Vigilantism, public shaming, and social media hegemony: The role of digital-networked images in humiliation and sociopolitical control.

Kelman, H. G. (1973). Violence without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers.

Kernberg, O. (2003). Sanctioned social violence: A psychoanalytic view - Part I. The International Journal of Psycho-analysis.

Kil, S. H., et al. (2009). Securing borders: patriotism, vigilantism and the brutalization of the US American public.

Locke, R. (2022). Heroes or Villains? Dianoia: The Undergraduate Philosophy Journal of Boston College.

MacNair, R. (2015). Theories Underlying Research in Peace Psychology.

McCreery, G. (2014). The Efficacy of Scapegoating and Revolutionary Violence. Philosophy Culture and Traditions.

McDermott, C. M., et al. (2016). Individual differences impact support for vigilante justice.

Nagengast, C. (1994). Violence, Terror, and The Crisis of The State.

Neapolitan, J. (1987). Vigilante Behavior and Attribution Bias.

Nivette, A. E. (2016). Institutional ineffectiveness, illegitimacy, and public support for vigilantism in Latin America.

Rice, C. (2015). A Group Therapist Reflects on Violence in America. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy.

Scott, et al. (2021). 

Soares, M., et al. (2018). Police Officers' Perspectives on State (Police) Violence: A Sociomoral and Psychological-Driven Study on Disengagement.

Tedeschi, J., et al. (1994). Violence, aggression & coercive actions.

Thomas, N. K. (2015). There's Always a Villain to Punish: Group Processes Contributing to Violence and Its Remediation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy.

Trepte, S., et al. (2017). Social Identity Theory and Self‐Categorization Theory.

White, A., et al. (2009). Justice by Any Means Necessary: Vigilantism among Indian Women.

Zaki, J. (2020). Catastrophe Compassion: Understanding and Extending Prosociality Under Crisis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Zmigrod, L., et al. (2020). Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action.

Zmigrod, L., et al. (2021). Cognition and Emotion in Extreme Political Action: Individual Differences and Dynamic Interactions. Current Directions in Psychological Science.